Journal 8: Choosing the Perfect Tools for One-to-One Learning

Citation: Bouterse, Brian (2009/08). Choosing the Perfect Tools for One-to-One. Learning and Leading with Technology, 1, Retrieved 08/07/2009, from
http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/LL/Current_Issue/L_L_August.htm

This article discusses the differences in the types of technology devices that teachers are most likely to use and have access to in their classrooms. It's a very informative article, especially if the reader lacks a broad knowledge base of how computers vary from machine to machine. The article reminds the reader that when selecting forms of technology, it is important to give enough consideration to how the device will be used, and how it could be used in the future. It is also helpful to remember the limitations of the students, and how easy the device will be to use in the classroom. You will also need to consider how accessible the device is for students outside of the classroom before handing out assignments. There were a couple different charts and graphics that try to illustrate how the different devices compare to each other, and what the benefits and faults of each instrument are.

How likely is it that a school will have a one-to-one program in place? As the use of technology in every day life increases, I think that the use of technology in the classroom will follow right behind. While there are many school districts across the nation that may not be able to afford one-to-one programs due to lack of funding, hopefully in the future- as more consideration is given to the importance of technology and education- there will be ways to accommodate such programs. School districts should remember that even technology that is considered old and maybe a little out dated is better than no technology at all, because it can at least set up the building blocks for technical competency.

Is this article helpful to districts looking to implement one-to-one programs? While there was some helpful information in the article, I think a lot of it was common sense and things that I would hope schools would automatically consider before they incorporate anything new into the curriculum. The chart in the article had the potential to be very informative, but I don't think it did a lot to clarify what the exact differences are between the devices being compared. Things such as price and something other than "multi-purpose" for the uses would have been helpful. Also, if the reader doesn't know a lot about technology, a lot of the vocabulary used isn't very meaningful.